{"id":45917,"date":"2022-04-14T23:20:43","date_gmt":"2022-04-14T23:20:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thepicpedia.com\/faq\/gramsci-who-needs-a-book-when-you-have-a-notebook\/"},"modified":"2022-04-14T23:20:43","modified_gmt":"2022-04-14T23:20:43","slug":"gramsci-who-needs-a-book-when-you-have-a-notebook","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thepicpedia.com\/faq\/gramsci-who-needs-a-book-when-you-have-a-notebook\/","title":{"rendered":"Gramsci, who needs a book when you have a notebook ?"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gramsci<\/strong> is best known for his theory of cultural hegemony, which describes how the state and ruling capitalist class \u2013 the bourgeoisie \u2013 use cultural institutions to maintain power in capitalist societies.<\/p>\n You asked, what is Gramsci’s theory of hegemony? Gramsci developed the notion of hegemony in the Prison Writings. The idea came as part of his critique of the deterministic economist interpretation of history; of \u201cmechanical historical materialism.\u201d Hegemony, to Gramsci, is the \u201ccultural, moral and ideological\u201d leadership of a group over allied and subaltern groups.<\/p>\n As many you asked, what should I read by Gramsci? <\/p>\n Beside above, where did Gramsci write about hegemony? The Italian communist Antonio Gramsci, imprisoned for much of his life by Mussolini, took these idea further in his Prison Notebooks with his widely influential notions of ‘hegemony’ and the ‘manufacture of consent’ (Gramsci<\/strong> 1971).<\/p>\n Amazingly, who are intellectuals According to Gramsci? Intellectuals are the group of people most responsible for social stability and change. According to Gramsci<\/strong>, \u201cit is them who sustain, modify and alter modes of thinking and behavior of the masses. They are purveyors of consciousness\u201d(Gramsci, 1994, p. 14).<\/p>\n Gramsci also defined traditional intellectuals as those within the capitalist mode of production that remained remote and aloof from the economic and political needs of the capitalist class despite their assimilation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Antonio Gramsci is especially associated with a non-deterministic version of Neo-Marxism in which the organisation of functions of the superstructure of capitalist societies are seen as more independent of the economic base and individuals have considerable , although certainly not total, freedom to influence political …<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Antonio Gramsci coined the term subaltern to identify the cultural hegemony that excludes and displaces specific people and social groups from the socio-economic institutions of society, in order to deny their agency and voices in colonial politics.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Because Gramsci’s first audience was always the prison censors, the writing can be deliberately indirect or obtuse, and therefore difficult to read.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n In Marxist philosophy, cultural hegemony is the dominance of a culturally diverse society by the ruling class who manipulate the culture of that society\u2014the beliefs and explanations, perceptions, values, and mores\u2014so that the worldview of the ruling class becomes the accepted cultural norm.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n When one distinguishes between intellectuals and non-intellectuals, one is referring in reality only to the immediate social function of the professional category of the intellectuals, that is, one has in mind the direction in which their specific professional activity is weighted, whether towards intellectual …<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The subaltern and oppressed are not interchangeable terms. All subaltern are oppressed but not all oppressed are subaltern. Subjectivity: Foucault and Deleuze ascribe to the poststructuralist traditional model that believe desire, interest, and intent are all united and all the same in the formation of the subject.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, in her influential essay, \u201dCan the Subaltern Speak? ‘ argues that the abolition of the Hindu rite of sati in India by the British \u201dhas been generally understood as a case of \u201dWhite men saving brown women from brown men”.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Gayatri Spivak defined subaltern in the following words: \u201cSubaltern is not just a classy word for ‘oppressed’, for the other, for somebody who’s not getting a piece of the pie\u2026. In post-colonial terms, everything that has limited or no access to the cultural imperialism is subaltern-a space of difference.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n According to Gramsci, hegemony (\u201cpredominance by consent\u201d) is a condition in which a fundamental class exercises a political, intellectual, and moral role of leadership within a hegemonic system cemented by a common world-view or \u201corganic ideology.\u201d The exercise of this role on the ethico-political as well as on the …<\/p>\n<\/p>\n What Is Marxism? Marxism is a social, political, and economic philosophy named after Karl Marx. It examines the effect of capitalism on labor, productivity, and economic development and argues for a worker revolution to overturn capitalism in favor of communism.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Gramsci’s analysis of hegemony thus involves an analysis of the ways in which such capitalist ideas are disseminated and accepted as commonsensical and normal. A hegemonic class is one that is able to attain the consent of other social forces, and the retention of this consent is an ongoing project.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n ‘ It is, rather, that, both as object of colonialist historiography and as subject of insurgency, the ideological construction of gender keeps the male dominant. If, in the context of colonial production, the subaltern has no history and cannot speak, the subaltern as female is even more deeply in shadow. . . .<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The answer is no, the subaltern cannot speak.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Now who would say that’s just the oppressed? The working class is oppressed. It’s not subaltern\u201d (de Kock interview). Another misreading of the concept is that, since the subaltern cannot speak, she needs an advocate to speak for her, affirmative action or special regulatory protection.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n A critical analysis of Spivak’s classic 1988 postcolonial studies essay, in which she argues that a core problem for the poorest and most marginalized in society (the subalterns) is that they have no platform to express their concerns and no voice to affect policy debates or demand a fairer share of society’s goods.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Spivak’s essay “Can the Subaltern Speak?”–originally published in Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg’s Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (1988)–perhaps best demonstrates her concern for the processes whereby postcolonial studies ironically reinscribe, co-opt, and rehearse neo-colonial imperatives of political …<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The title was a seductive simplification, marking the spot where, it was hoped, several debates and discourses might converge in the consciousness of their debt to an extraordinary essay, \u201cCan the Subaltern Speak?\u201d penned by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak some twenty years previously.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Spivak asserts that the subaltern subject is heterogeneous and, by examining the mechanisms of the supposed ‘recovery’ of their voice, instead an ongoing displacement and effacement is revealed. The key subject position disentangled by Spivak is that of the female subaltern and the practice of sati or widow immolation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Generally speaking, \u201che refers to slaves, peasants, religious groups, women, different races, the popolani (common people) and popolo (people) of the medieval communes, the proletariat, and the bourgeoisie prior to the [Italian] Risorgimento as subaltern groups.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Marxism seeks to explain social phenomena within any given society by analyzing the material conditions and economic activities required to fulfill human material needs.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The Marxist criticism definition is an approach to diagnosing political and social problems in terms of the struggles between members of different socio-economic classes. Drawing from this approach, criticism does not aim at the flaws of particular individuals, even if they have attained positions of power.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n Here’s how the dictionary defines Marxism: ‘the political, economic, and social theories of Karl Marx, including the belief that struggle between social classes is a major force in history, and there should eventually be a society in which there are no classes. ‘<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The broadest observation, however, is this: Hegemony depends upon authority, not merely power, and authority depends upon legitimacy, and legitimacy has external, internal, and (crucially, but hardest to explain) exemplary aspects to it.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The three types of hegemony are military, political, and economic.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Gramsci is best known for his theory of cultural hegemony, which describes how the state and ruling capitalist class \u2013 the bourgeoisie \u2013 use cultural institutions to maintain power in capitalist societies. You asked, what is Gramsci’s theory of hegemony? Gramsci developed the notion of hegemony in the Prison Writings. The idea came as part …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepicpedia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45917"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepicpedia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepicpedia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepicpedia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepicpedia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45917"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepicpedia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45917\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thepicpedia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45917"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepicpedia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45917"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thepicpedia.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45917"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
What does Gramsci mean by intellectuals?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
Is Gramsci a neo Marxist?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
What did Gramsci mean by subaltern?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
Is Gramci hard to read?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
What is the meaning of cultural hegemony?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
How does Gramsci distinguish between intellectuals and non intellectuals?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
Are all oppressed people subalterns?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
Can subaltern speak by Gayatri Spivak summary?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
What does Spivak mean by Subalternity?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
What are the key characteristics of hegemony According to Gramsci?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
What is Marxist ideology?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
What is capitalist hegemony?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
Do the subaltern speak?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
Can the Subaltern Speak as a feminist text?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
Can the Subaltern Speak as a postcolonial text?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
What is the main problem with Gayatri Spivak’s view of the subaltern?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
Can the Subaltern Speak in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
Can subaltern speak is an article written by?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
What is Spivak’s theory?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
Which groups are subaltern?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
What is the ultimate goal of Marxism?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
What is the Marxist criticism?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
How do you explain Marxism to a child?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
What is the relationship between legitimacy and hegemony?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n
What are the three types of hegemony?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n